Menu

Niva vs BATE II

10 August 2025 at 14:00City Stadium
Home

Niva

53

Match Summary

Niva defeated BATE II 5:3. The match was played in 1. Division 2025. Goals were scored by A. Tkhagalegov 13′, V. Dybin 21′, D. Fedortsov 34′, N. Leshkevich 37′, I. Charnykh 55′, V. Shubovich 57′ (o.g.), V. Kiselev 59′, N. Chuyko 89′. 6 yellow cards were shown. Niva made 5 substitutions, BATE II made 5.

Match Events

Key match events between Niva and BATE II — 8 goals and 6 cards recorded during the match.

Kick Off
21′
29′
31′
34′
Half Time
46′
R. AliyevI. Kuimov
55′
I. Charnykh

assist: A. Shkondin

57′
V. Shubovich

Own Goal · assist: V. Orlovskyi

59′
V. Kiselev
66′
V. OrlovskyiV. Golovachenko
76′
78′
80′
E. ChuevskiyD. Vergeichik
89′
Full Time

Lineups

Niva lined up in a — formation, while BATE II deployed a —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Niva have contributed 20 goals and 0 assists this season, led by D. Fedortsov (7G). BATE II's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Niva field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus BATE II's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Discipline

Niva's starters have collected 5 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for BATE II. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Niva's starting XI is 29.9 (youngest: D. Sibilev (25), oldest: V. Shcherbo (39)), while BATE II average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Niva's starters average 8 league appearances each, versus 0 for BATE II. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

NivaPosition StrengthBATE II
Niva
12MidfielderN. Dovnar
7MidfielderD. Mulkevich2G
8MidfielderD. Sibilev
10MidfielderV. Dybin2G
18MidfielderV. Shcherbo
21MidfielderN. Leshkevich3G
23MidfielderD. Fedortsov7G
29MidfielderP. Pampukha5G
41MidfielderA. Tkhagalegov
77MidfielderV. Shubovich1G
88MidfielderR. Kozel
BATE II
30MidfielderM. Klyakin
5MidfielderZ. Shevchik
6MidfielderE. Chuevskiy
7MidfielderV. Kiselev
8MidfielderP. Kolosovskiy
15MidfielderA. Shkondin
16MidfielderI. Charnykh
17MidfielderR. Aliyev
19MidfielderY. Shumskiy
21MidfielderV. Orlovskyi
22MidfielderY. Kuzmenok

Rivalry since 2024

Niva vs BATE II Head to Head Results· 3

Niva and BATE II have met 3 times — Niva won 1, BATE II won 1, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2024. A combined 10 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 3.33 per match (7 for the home side, 3 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 2 matches (67%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 game (33%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 6–1 in 2024.

1
wins
Drawn
1
·
1
wins
Total goals
10 · 3.3/match
Both scored
2/3 · 67%
Over 2.5
1/3 · 33%

Recent Meetings

06/04/251. Division
Match Details
17/11/241. Division
Match Details
26/07/241. Division
Match Details
Highest-scoring game: 61 v 2024

Recent Form

WWonDDrawnLLost

In their last 6 matches, Niva have recorded 1 win, 4 draws and 1 defeat. BATE II show 1 win, 2 draws and 3 losses from their last 6 outings.

Niva

DDLWDD

BATE II

LWLDDL

Match Prediction

Predicted winnerBATE II

Niva

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

BATE II

45%

Away win

Statistical tip

Double chance: draw or BATE II

47%Form53%
42%Attack58%
33%Defence67%
70%Goals30%
50%Head-to-head50%
46.7%Overall53.3%

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026