Frauen Bundesliga· Season 2025
Match Summary
Bayer Leverkusen W defeated RB Leipzig W 3:1. The match was played in Frauen Bundesliga 2025. Goals were scored by L. Baum 4′, C. Kramer 18′, K. Piljic 38′, R. Grant 80′. 3 yellow cards were shown. RB Leipzig W made 4 substitutions, Bayer Leverkusen W made 4.
Match Events
Key match events between RB Leipzig W and Bayer Leverkusen W — 4 goals and 3 cards recorded during the match.
assist: V. Fudalla
Lineups
RB Leipzig W lined up in a — formation under Jonas Stephan, while Bayer Leverkusen W deployed a — under Roberto Patzold.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for RB Leipzig W is 6.85, compared to 6.96 for Bayer Leverkusen W. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. RB Leipzig W's highest-rated starter is J. Landenberger (7.19), while Bayer Leverkusen W's best-rated player is V. Fudalla (7.52).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of RB Leipzig W have contributed 23 goals and 13 assists this season, led by E. Asgeirsdottir (5G). Bayer Leverkusen W's starters account for 22 goals and 13 assists, spearheaded by V. Fudalla (10G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Midfield Control
RB Leipzig W field 11 midfielders averaging 6.85, versus Bayer Leverkusen W's 11 rated 6.96. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 79% for RB Leipzig W and 74% for Bayer Leverkusen W. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
RB Leipzig W's starters have collected 34 yellow cards this season, compared to 28 for Bayer Leverkusen W. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of RB Leipzig W's starting XI is 22.3 (youngest: L. Baum (18), oldest: S. Starke (30)), while Bayer Leverkusen W average 22.8 (youngest: L. Bender (20), oldest: S. Ostermeier (26)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
RB Leipzig W's starters average 23 league appearances each, versus 20 for Bayer Leverkusen W. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Rivalry since 2023
RB Leipzig W vs Bayer Leverkusen W Head to Head Results· 5
RB Leipzig W and Bayer Leverkusen W have met 5 times — RB Leipzig W won 1, Bayer Leverkusen W won 3, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2023. Bayer Leverkusen W leads the head-to-head with 3 victories from 5 meetings. A combined 10 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.00 per match (4 for the home side, 6 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 2 matches (40%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 game (20%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. Bayer Leverkusen W are currently unbeaten in the last 3 meetings. The highest-scoring encounter finished 3–2 in 2025.
Recent Meetings
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, RB Leipzig W have recorded 1 win, 3 draws and 2 defeats. Bayer Leverkusen W show 5 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss from their last 6 outings.
Match Prediction
Statistical tip
Double chance: draw or Bayer Leverkusen W
Bookmaker Odds
Best price
RB Leipzig W
5.22
1xBet
Draw
4.20
Marathonbet
Bayer Leverkusen W
1.57
Unibet
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
API data: 17 May 2026