Sutjeska vs ML Vitebsk

ML Vitebsk, carrying a 3-0 lead from the first leg in Belarus, struck early to effectively kill the tie. Artem Kontsevoy opened the scoring in the 16th minute, latching onto a loose ball and finishing with his right foot to give the visitors a 1-0 lead on the night and a 4-0 aggregate cushion.

Sutjeska struggled to create clear openings in the first half against a well-organised Vitebsk defence. The hosts ended the opening period without a shot on target, and the score remained 0-1 at the break.

The Montenegrin side emerged with renewed purpose after half-time. Manager Miljan Radović made an early double substitution, introducing Balsa Tošković and Petar Aničić just before the hour mark. Tošković justified the decision within 30 minutes: in the 84th minute, Marko Šimun's delivery found Tošković inside the box and the substitute smashed home a right-footed shot to level the match at 1-1.

Just as Sutjeska sensed a second goal and a rare glimmer of a comeback, ML Vitebsk struck the decisive blow. In the 90th minute, Valeri Gromyko picked out Bassekou Diabaté — himself a half-time substitute — who rifled a right-footed shot past the Sutjeska goalkeeper to restore the visitors' lead. The goal secured a 2-1 win on the night and a 5-1 aggregate victory.

Bassekou Diabaté's introduction at half-time proved decisive. The Malian forward replaced Denilho Cleonise in a tactical switch that gave Vitebsk more attacking thrust on the counter. With Sutjeska pushing forward after Tošković's equaliser, Diabaté exploited the space in behind and delivered the killer blow in the 90th minute, converting Gromyko's assist to end any lingering doubt about which side would advance.

Bassekou Diabaté (ML Vitebsk) — The half-time substitute scored the match-winning goal deep into stoppage time. His movement and finishing ability changed the game's complexion when Sutjeska were pressing for a second.

Artem Kontsevoy (ML Vitebsk) — Opened the scoring with a clinical 16th-minute finish that effectively ended the tie as a contest. His early goal gave Vitebsk the control they never truly relinquished.

Balsa Tošković (Sutjeska) — The substitute scored Sutjeska's only goal of the tie, a well-taken 84th-minute equaliser that briefly sparked hope. However, he was also booked for a bad foul — emblematic of a side that struggled to balance aggression with discipline across the two legs.

Valeri Gromyko (ML Vitebsk) — Provided the assist for Diabaté's winner and was a constant threat from midfield, dictating the tempo for the visitors throughout the second half.

Player of the match: Bassekou Diabaté

Sutjeska's three yellow cards (Babić 54', Tošković 65', Raznatović 66') tell the story of a side that grew increasingly frustrated as the tie slipped away. All three bookings arrived in a 12-minute second-half spell, signalling the fracture in discipline as Vitebsk's game management took over. With the aggregate scoreboard already heavily against them, Sutjeska's attempts to force their way back into the game left them exposed at the back — a vulnerability Diabaté exploited to decisive effect.

Vitebsk's efficiency is also reflected in the scoreline: they scored twice from open play despite making five substitutions and managing the game's final phase with composure. Sutjeska, by contrast, required a substitute to find the net for their only goal of the tie, underlining the lack of cutting edge in their starting XI.

ML Vitebsk advance to the UEFA Europa Conference League third qualifying round with a comprehensive 5-1 aggregate victory. The Belarusian side will face a tougher test in the next round, with their opponent yet to be confirmed at the time of writing. For Sutjeska, whose European campaign ends at the second qualifying hurdle, attention now returns to the Montenegrin First League.

A tie that was effectively settled in the first leg in Belarus, where Vitebsk ran out 3-0 winners. The return leg followed a similar pattern: an early away goal, patient control from Vitebsk, a brief flicker of resistance from Sutjeska, and a late sucker-punch. The gulf in quality between the two sides was evident across the 180 minutes — Vitebsk were sharper, more clinical, and better organised from first whistle to last.